<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777954</link>
    <description>ITAT (Kol.) quashed reassessment issued under s.147/148 for failure to record requisite reasons as mandated by the proviso, holding the reopening invalid. On merits, the tribunal reversed addition under s.68, finding the unsecured loans were repaid, interest paid and TDS deducted under s.194A, negating accommodation-entry suspicion. CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777954</link>
      <description>ITAT (Kol.) quashed reassessment issued under s.147/148 for failure to record requisite reasons as mandated by the proviso, holding the reopening invalid. On merits, the tribunal reversed addition under s.68, finding the unsecured loans were repaid, interest paid and TDS deducted under s.194A, negating accommodation-entry suspicion. CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>