<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 444 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777955</link>
    <description>ITAT PUNE - AT deleted the disallowance of business expenses, holding that a partnership firm may pay partner remuneration in cash and that the payments were within limits under s.40A(b)(v) and in accordance with the partnership deed. The tribunal found no doubt as to genuineness, noted books were maintained and not rejected, gross receipts and profits supported the payments, and the AO erred in disallowing amounts solely because they were paid in cash.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 444 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777955</link>
      <description>ITAT PUNE - AT deleted the disallowance of business expenses, holding that a partnership firm may pay partner remuneration in cash and that the payments were within limits under s.40A(b)(v) and in accordance with the partnership deed. The tribunal found no doubt as to genuineness, noted books were maintained and not rejected, gross receipts and profits supported the payments, and the AO erred in disallowing amounts solely because they were paid in cash.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>