https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777961 HC dismissed the petition and declined to interfere with the Settlement Commission's order under Article 227. The Court found no need to remand because the disallowance of product registration expenses had already been decided on merits by CIT(A) and the Tribunal in favor of the assessee, and the Revenue's appeal was disposed of on low tax effect. The Settlement Commission therefore lacked basis to revisit the issue, and the impugned order was upheld. en-us Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777961 HC dismissed the petition and declined to interfere with the Settlement Commission's order under Article 227. The Court found no need to remand because the disallowance of product registration expenses had already been decided on merits by CIT(A) and the Tribunal in favor of the assessee, and the Revenue's appeal was disposed of on low tax effect. The Settlement Commission therefore lacked basis to revisit the issue, and the impugned order was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777961