<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 453 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777964</link>
    <description>Refund of accumulated input tax credit arising from an inverted tax structure was sought under Section 54 of the CGST Act, and the Department&#039;s failure to process the claim despite prior communications was treated as contrary to the statutory refund framework. The Court directed prompt processing of the refund and payment of interest within the time granted, giving effect to the obligation to deal with such claims within the prescribed timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 453 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777964</link>
      <description>Refund of accumulated input tax credit arising from an inverted tax structure was sought under Section 54 of the CGST Act, and the Department&#039;s failure to process the claim despite prior communications was treated as contrary to the statutory refund framework. The Court directed prompt processing of the refund and payment of interest within the time granted, giving effect to the obligation to deal with such claims within the prescribed timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>