<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 459 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777970</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition, holding the delay in filing the statutory appeal under Section 107 could not be condoned. Relying on SC precedent, the court found the time-limit in the specific tax/code provision is absolute and excludes application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act; neither the appellate mechanism nor the writ jurisdiction can extend prescribed statutory periods. Because the petitioner sought relief after the limitation expired, the petition was not maintainable and was accordingly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 459 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777970</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition, holding the delay in filing the statutory appeal under Section 107 could not be condoned. Relying on SC precedent, the court found the time-limit in the specific tax/code provision is absolute and excludes application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act; neither the appellate mechanism nor the writ jurisdiction can extend prescribed statutory periods. Because the petitioner sought relief after the limitation expired, the petition was not maintainable and was accordingly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>