https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777973 A writ petition challenging a tax adjudication order was not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal existed under the SGST Act. The Court applied the settled rule that Article 226 jurisdiction should ordinarily not be used to bypass the appellate mechanism against an order-in-original passed on merits, and rejected the contention that pre-deposit requirements justified resort to writ remedy. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777973 A writ petition challenging a tax adjudication order was not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal existed under the SGST Act. The Court applied the settled rule that Article 226 jurisdiction should ordinarily not be used to bypass the appellate mechanism against an order-in-original passed on merits, and rejected the contention that pre-deposit requirements justified resort to writ remedy. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777973