<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 468 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777979</link>
    <description>HC set aside the latter part of the impugned order dated 27.09.2023 that had remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority and directed the Joint Commissioner, CGST Appeals, NOIDA to decide the appeals afresh in accordance with law. The writ petition was entertained despite being filed against an appeal order because the GST Tribunal is not functioning. The writ petition is disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 468 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777979</link>
      <description>HC set aside the latter part of the impugned order dated 27.09.2023 that had remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority and directed the Joint Commissioner, CGST Appeals, NOIDA to decide the appeals afresh in accordance with law. The writ petition was entertained despite being filed against an appeal order because the GST Tribunal is not functioning. The writ petition is disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>