<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1692 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463587</link>
    <description>ITAT (Visakhapatnam) held that the assessee lawfully claimed a TDS refund after verification of Form 26AS and that the AO had examined and allowed the TDS credit and refund; PCIT failed to demonstrate any error or prejudicial order by the AO. Section 263 could not be invoked where the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The revisionary proceedings under s.263 were held without jurisdiction and set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1692 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463587</link>
      <description>ITAT (Visakhapatnam) held that the assessee lawfully claimed a TDS refund after verification of Form 26AS and that the AO had examined and allowed the TDS credit and refund; PCIT failed to demonstrate any error or prejudicial order by the AO. Section 263 could not be invoked where the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The revisionary proceedings under s.263 were held without jurisdiction and set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>