<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46350</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that &#039;Lympo&#039;, a lime-pozzolana mixture, should be classified under Tariff Item 68, not Tariff Item 23, of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal and directing consideration of the appellant&#039;s exemption claim under Notification No. 116/75-C.E. &#039;Lympo&#039; was deemed a cement substitute, not cement, based on trade parlance and statutory distinctions, impacting its classification. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46350</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that &#039;Lympo&#039;, a lime-pozzolana mixture, should be classified under Tariff Item 68, not Tariff Item 23, of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal and directing consideration of the appellant&#039;s exemption claim under Notification No. 116/75-C.E. &#039;Lympo&#039; was deemed a cement substitute, not cement, based on trade parlance and statutory distinctions, impacting its classification. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>