<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 139 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46346</link>
    <description>Losses of cement clinker occurring during transport between factory sites were treated as natural losses arising in the course of movement, particularly where the loss was attributable to handling and loading at intermediate stages. Relying on the earlier decision on the same question, the Court accepted that such transport-related losses qualified for full exemption from excise duty. The exemption was therefore justified in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 139 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46346</link>
      <description>Losses of cement clinker occurring during transport between factory sites were treated as natural losses arising in the course of movement, particularly where the loss was attributable to handling and loading at intermediate stages. Relying on the earlier decision on the same question, the Court accepted that such transport-related losses qualified for full exemption from excise duty. The exemption was therefore justified in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>