https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463574 The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the Calcutta HC orders that had quashed disciplinary proceedings, and dismissed the respondent's writ petition. The Court held the Commandant validly ordered an additional record of evidence to clarify the incident date, finding no usurpation of jurisdiction, and that the SSFC was not required under the BSF Act and Rules to record reasons for its guilty finding. The respondent was not prejudiced by the proceedings, so the High Court's interference was reversed. en-us Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Sep 2025 11:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463574 The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the Calcutta HC orders that had quashed disciplinary proceedings, and dismissed the respondent's writ petition. The Court held the Commandant validly ordered an additional record of evidence to clarify the incident date, finding no usurpation of jurisdiction, and that the SSFC was not required under the BSF Act and Rules to record reasons for its guilty finding. The respondent was not prejudiced by the proceedings, so the High Court's interference was reversed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463574