<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1591 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463563</link>
    <description>Limitation for filing an appeal under the insolvency regime runs from the date the order is pronounced, not from the date it is uploaded. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in V. Nagarajan, the NCLAT stated that the appellant could not claim exclusion of the period between pronouncement and upload of the order. It further noted that the proviso to Section 61(2) permits condonation of delay only up to 15 days, and once the appeal is filed beyond the 45-day outer limit, the tribunal has no jurisdiction to condone the delay. The delay condonation application was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 16:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1591 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463563</link>
      <description>Limitation for filing an appeal under the insolvency regime runs from the date the order is pronounced, not from the date it is uploaded. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in V. Nagarajan, the NCLAT stated that the appellant could not claim exclusion of the period between pronouncement and upload of the order. It further noted that the proviso to Section 61(2) permits condonation of delay only up to 15 days, and once the appeal is filed beyond the 45-day outer limit, the tribunal has no jurisdiction to condone the delay. The delay condonation application was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>