<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1683 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463565</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the SC declined to interfere with the impugned judgment upholding a penalty for violation of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. The appeal was dismissed because no sufficient ground was found to disturb the concurrent findings affirming the regulatory penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 16:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1683 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463565</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the SC declined to interfere with the impugned judgment upholding a penalty for violation of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. The appeal was dismissed because no sufficient ground was found to disturb the concurrent findings affirming the regulatory penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>