<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46338</link>
    <description>Whether the parties are &quot;related persons&quot; for entitlement to exemption under Notification 71/78: SC, on findings of common directors, familial relationships and mutuality of interest, held the entities are related persons; conclusion in favour of relatedness set aside the contrary Tribunal finding - outcome: entities treated as related persons. Whether there was suppression of material facts and applicability of the extended limitation under s.11A of the Excise Act: Court found full disclosure of sale price and inter-company differential, negating suppression; outcome: extended six-month limitation under s.11A is unavailable to Revenue and claimed duty for April 11, 1978-Sep 29, 1979 was barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 15:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46338</link>
      <description>Whether the parties are &quot;related persons&quot; for entitlement to exemption under Notification 71/78: SC, on findings of common directors, familial relationships and mutuality of interest, held the entities are related persons; conclusion in favour of relatedness set aside the contrary Tribunal finding - outcome: entities treated as related persons. Whether there was suppression of material facts and applicability of the extended limitation under s.11A of the Excise Act: Court found full disclosure of sale price and inter-company differential, negating suppression; outcome: extended six-month limitation under s.11A is unavailable to Revenue and claimed duty for April 11, 1978-Sep 29, 1979 was barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>