<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1399 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463568</link>
    <description>HC admitted the appeal on the substantial questions of law framed as Questions Nos. 2 and 4, concerning whether the ITAT was justified in deleting additions made under section 115JB for redelivery charges of aircraft (amounting to Rs. 1,96,62,235) and for frequent flyer expenses. The court directed the Registry to serve a copy of the order upon the ITAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 16:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1399 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463568</link>
      <description>HC admitted the appeal on the substantial questions of law framed as Questions Nos. 2 and 4, concerning whether the ITAT was justified in deleting additions made under section 115JB for redelivery charges of aircraft (amounting to Rs. 1,96,62,235) and for frequent flyer expenses. The court directed the Registry to serve a copy of the order upon the ITAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>