<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1501 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463571</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petition, finding a 183-day unexplained delay in filing and concluding the petition lacked merit. The challenge to reopening assessment under section 147-concerning whether authorities had mere suspicion or sufficient reason to believe income was escaped-was rejected on its merits. Consequently the petition was dismissed both for inordinate delay and for failure to establish substance in the claims against the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1501 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463571</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petition, finding a 183-day unexplained delay in filing and concluding the petition lacked merit. The challenge to reopening assessment under section 147-concerning whether authorities had mere suspicion or sufficient reason to believe income was escaped-was rejected on its merits. Consequently the petition was dismissed both for inordinate delay and for failure to establish substance in the claims against the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>