<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Quashing denial of time-bar of input tax credit under Section 16(4) due to defective GST portal service under Section 169</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92287</link>
    <description>HC quashed the impugned assessment order dated 17.08.2024 insofar as it denied the petitioner&#039;s claim for input tax credit under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act as time-barred, holding the order was passed without affording an effective opportunity of personal hearing. The court found mere upload of a show-cause notice on the GST portal, without exploring alternative modes of service under Section 169 where no response was received, amounted to defective service and a breach of natural justice. The HC disposed of the petition, setting aside the impugned order to the extent indicated and warning against sustaining ex parte assessments founded on empty formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Quashing denial of time-bar of input tax credit under Section 16(4) due to defective GST portal service under Section 169</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92287</link>
      <description>HC quashed the impugned assessment order dated 17.08.2024 insofar as it denied the petitioner&#039;s claim for input tax credit under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act as time-barred, holding the order was passed without affording an effective opportunity of personal hearing. The court found mere upload of a show-cause notice on the GST portal, without exploring alternative modes of service under Section 169 where no response was received, amounted to defective service and a breach of natural justice. The HC disposed of the petition, setting aside the impugned order to the extent indicated and warning against sustaining ex parte assessments founded on empty formalities.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>