https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92269 HC allowed the writ, holding that rejection of the Petitioner's SVLDR-1 declaration without affording an opportunity of hearing violated principles of natural justice. The impugned e-mail rejection dated 6 February 2020 was quashed and set aside, and the declaration was ordered to be accepted with the duty liability quantified at Rs. 1,06,21,929/-. The Respondents were directed to compute the revised payable amount under the SVLDR scheme, deducting a verified pre-deposit of Rs. 29,72,500/-. The petition was disposed of, with the court noting that upholding the rejection would have necessitated protracted adjudication and appeals, causing undue prejudice to the Petitioner. en-us Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:25 +0530 Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92269 HC allowed the writ, holding that rejection of the Petitioner's SVLDR-1 declaration without affording an opportunity of hearing violated principles of natural justice. The impugned e-mail rejection dated 6 February 2020 was quashed and set aside, and the declaration was ordered to be accepted with the duty liability quantified at Rs. 1,06,21,929/-. The Respondents were directed to compute the revised payable amount under the SVLDR scheme, deducting a verified pre-deposit of Rs. 29,72,500/-. The petition was disposed of, with the court noting that upholding the rejection would have necessitated protracted adjudication and appeals, causing undue prejudice to the Petitioner. Highlights Service Tax Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:25 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92269