<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 337 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777848</link>
    <description>Section 14 moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars continuation of provident fund assessment proceedings after commencement of CIRP where they culminate in a pecuniary liability against the corporate debtor. An assessment or demand completed during the moratorium cannot be enforced against the debtor, and a claim founded on such post-moratorium assessment cannot be admitted in CIRP. The appellate tribunal also noted that a direction to furnish employee-wise details and reassess the claim was unnecessary once the underlying assessment and demand were impermissible during the moratorium.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 337 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777848</link>
      <description>Section 14 moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars continuation of provident fund assessment proceedings after commencement of CIRP where they culminate in a pecuniary liability against the corporate debtor. An assessment or demand completed during the moratorium cannot be enforced against the debtor, and a claim founded on such post-moratorium assessment cannot be admitted in CIRP. The appellate tribunal also noted that a direction to furnish employee-wise details and reassess the claim was unnecessary once the underlying assessment and demand were impermissible during the moratorium.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>