<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH AT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777849</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the recall application and refused to recall its prior order. The Tribunal noted it has no power of review though it can recall judgments in limited circumstances (fraud, court being misled, lack of jurisdiction, non-joinder/non-service, or mistake prejudicing a party). The appellant&#039;s grievance that adverse remarks were made in his absence did not meet those grounds, no fraud or jurisdictional defect was found, and no factual error in the Tribunal&#039;s order was shown. The application effectively sought a review, which is impermissible; dismissal affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH AT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777849</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the recall application and refused to recall its prior order. The Tribunal noted it has no power of review though it can recall judgments in limited circumstances (fraud, court being misled, lack of jurisdiction, non-joinder/non-service, or mistake prejudicing a party). The appellant&#039;s grievance that adverse remarks were made in his absence did not meet those grounds, no fraud or jurisdictional defect was found, and no factual error in the Tribunal&#039;s order was shown. The application effectively sought a review, which is impermissible; dismissal affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>