<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 352 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777863</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the disallowance under s.36(1)(va). The tribunal found the employer had deposited employees&#039; PF/ESIC contributions within the statutory due dates; the one-day delay in credit arose from technical glitches beyond the assessee&#039;s control. As payment was made in time under the relevant enactments, the late credit could not justify disallowance, and the addition was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 352 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777863</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the disallowance under s.36(1)(va). The tribunal found the employer had deposited employees&#039; PF/ESIC contributions within the statutory due dates; the one-day delay in credit arose from technical glitches beyond the assessee&#039;s control. As payment was made in time under the relevant enactments, the late credit could not justify disallowance, and the addition was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>