<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777865</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that penalty under s.271D for alleged breach of s.269SS cannot be sustained because receipt of Rs.26,50,000 in cash by the assessee was not conclusively proved. The revenue failed to examine the purchaser and builders, and a collaboration agreement and industry practice regarding reconstruction supported the assessee&#039;s position. On these facts the tribunal deleted the penalty and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777865</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that penalty under s.271D for alleged breach of s.269SS cannot be sustained because receipt of Rs.26,50,000 in cash by the assessee was not conclusively proved. The revenue failed to examine the purchaser and builders, and a collaboration agreement and industry practice regarding reconstruction supported the assessee&#039;s position. On these facts the tribunal deleted the penalty and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>