<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 356 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777867</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal against reopening u/s 147 and the addition to &quot;Income from Other Sources,&quot; holding that documentary evidence established the agricultural income was jointly earned by the family rather than individual income and not disguised unaccounted income. The AO and CIT(A) improperly ignored evidence presented during assessment and appellate proceedings, so the impugned addition was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 356 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777867</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal against reopening u/s 147 and the addition to &quot;Income from Other Sources,&quot; holding that documentary evidence established the agricultural income was jointly earned by the family rather than individual income and not disguised unaccounted income. The AO and CIT(A) improperly ignored evidence presented during assessment and appellate proceedings, so the impugned addition was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>