https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777897 HC dismissed the petition and upheld arbitral awards awarding contractors a 7% GST differential, finding invoices inadvertently raised at 5% instead of the applicable 12%. The court noted similarly placed contractors obtained favorable awards and earlier Section 34 challenges were dismissed by a common order dated 09.04.2025. The HC held the awards did not suffer from patent illegality nor contravene public policy, and affirmed entitlement under the contract's statutory variation clause. Petition dismissed. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777897 HC dismissed the petition and upheld arbitral awards awarding contractors a 7% GST differential, finding invoices inadvertently raised at 5% instead of the applicable 12%. The court noted similarly placed contractors obtained favorable awards and earlier Section 34 challenges were dismissed by a common order dated 09.04.2025. The HC held the awards did not suffer from patent illegality nor contravene public policy, and affirmed entitlement under the contract's statutory variation clause. Petition dismissed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777897