https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777897 Arbitral awards granting differential GST were challenged under Section 34, but the Court found the objections identical to those already rejected in connected matters involving similarly placed contractors. It held that the earlier common order had already upheld the awards and found no patent illegality or contravention of public policy. As no separate basis for interference was shown in the present petitions, the awards were sustained and the Section 34 petitions were liable to be dismissed. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777897 Arbitral awards granting differential GST were challenged under Section 34, but the Court found the objections identical to those already rejected in connected matters involving similarly placed contractors. It held that the earlier common order had already upheld the awards and found no patent illegality or contravention of public policy. As no separate basis for interference was shown in the present petitions, the awards were sustained and the Section 34 petitions were liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777897