<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 389 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777900</link>
    <description>HC refused to direct cancellation of the GST registration held by the grandson, observing that competing claims by the sons and the grandson about a will and succession remain sub judice in civil proceedings. The court held the genuineness and validity of the will and entitlement to the business have not been conclusively determined, and such substantive disputes fall within the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, not TSGST authorities. Writ petitions were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 389 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777900</link>
      <description>HC refused to direct cancellation of the GST registration held by the grandson, observing that competing claims by the sons and the grandson about a will and succession remain sub judice in civil proceedings. The court held the genuineness and validity of the will and entitlement to the business have not been conclusively determined, and such substantive disputes fall within the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, not TSGST authorities. Writ petitions were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>