<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1625 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463549</link>
    <description>UGC regulations governing sexual harassment complaints in higher educational institutions require an Internal Complaints Committee with a senior woman Presiding Officer, faculty and non-teaching members, student representation where students are involved, and an external member with relevant expertise; the committee&#039;s inclusion of research scholars was treated as consistent with that scheme. The inquiry process is a fact-finding mechanism, not a mere preliminary exercise, and a respondent who receives the complaint, is given an opportunity to respond, and participates in the proceedings cannot invalidate the result without showing real prejudice. On that basis, procedural objections did not defeat the committee&#039;s findings or the disciplinary action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 16:02:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1625 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463549</link>
      <description>UGC regulations governing sexual harassment complaints in higher educational institutions require an Internal Complaints Committee with a senior woman Presiding Officer, faculty and non-teaching members, student representation where students are involved, and an external member with relevant expertise; the committee&#039;s inclusion of research scholars was treated as consistent with that scheme. The inquiry process is a fact-finding mechanism, not a mere preliminary exercise, and a respondent who receives the complaint, is given an opportunity to respond, and participates in the proceedings cannot invalidate the result without showing real prejudice. On that basis, procedural objections did not defeat the committee&#039;s findings or the disciplinary action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>