<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1577 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463528</link>
    <description>Whether the impugned order warranted interference turned on the proper course after the order had stated that no substantial question of law arose, yet the matter had been set aside and remanded. The parties debated whether the appeal should be dismissed or whether the impugned order should itself be set aside with a fresh remand. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the High Court for disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 19:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1577 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463528</link>
      <description>Whether the impugned order warranted interference turned on the proper course after the order had stated that no substantial question of law arose, yet the matter had been set aside and remanded. The parties debated whether the appeal should be dismissed or whether the impugned order should itself be set aside with a fresh remand. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the High Court for disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>