<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1488 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463532</link>
    <description>The SC held the financial creditor&#039;s s.7 IBC application was not maintainable because the stated date of default (22.02.2021) fell within the moratorium period from 25.03.2020 to 25.03.2021, during which no CIRP application could be filed. The Court found no substantial question of law under s.62 of the IBC and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 19:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1488 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463532</link>
      <description>The SC held the financial creditor&#039;s s.7 IBC application was not maintainable because the stated date of default (22.02.2021) fell within the moratorium period from 25.03.2020 to 25.03.2021, during which no CIRP application could be filed. The Court found no substantial question of law under s.62 of the IBC and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>