<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1681 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463536</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that deductions under sections 80P(2)(d) and 80P(c)(ii) cannot be denied by importing the scope of one subsection into another. The tribunal noted the Registrar had not cancelled the co-operative housing society&#039;s registration for breach of mutuality or bye-laws, and therefore the interest income from co-operative banks remained eligible for deduction under the claimed provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 19:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1681 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463536</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that deductions under sections 80P(2)(d) and 80P(c)(ii) cannot be denied by importing the scope of one subsection into another. The tribunal noted the Registrar had not cancelled the co-operative housing society&#039;s registration for breach of mutuality or bye-laws, and therefore the interest income from co-operative banks remained eligible for deduction under the claimed provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>