<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1687 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463541</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune (AT) quashed the notice under s.148 and the order under s.148A(d) of the Act for the relevant assessment years, finding the facts identical to earlier precedents and following the Bombay HC and prior ITAT rulings. The tribunal held that the impugned notice and 148A(d) order were invalid and allowed the taxpayer&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 19:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1687 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463541</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune (AT) quashed the notice under s.148 and the order under s.148A(d) of the Act for the relevant assessment years, finding the facts identical to earlier precedents and following the Bombay HC and prior ITAT rulings. The tribunal held that the impugned notice and 148A(d) order were invalid and allowed the taxpayer&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>