https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46314 The Supreme Court modified the High Court's order in a case involving pre-deposit requirements in multiple appeals. It held that the appellant's deposit for a specific show cause notice sufficed for compliance, rather than requiring pre-deposit for all notices. The Court emphasized that interference in discretionary orders is rare but warranted here due to the improper exercise of discretion. By considering the amount already deposited, the Court ensured justice was served and directed the appeals to proceed accordingly without additional pre-deposit obligations. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:24:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46314 The Supreme Court modified the High Court's order in a case involving pre-deposit requirements in multiple appeals. It held that the appellant's deposit for a specific show cause notice sufficed for compliance, rather than requiring pre-deposit for all notices. The Court emphasized that interference in discretionary orders is rare but warranted here due to the improper exercise of discretion. By considering the amount already deposited, the Court ensured justice was served and directed the appeals to proceed accordingly without additional pre-deposit obligations. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46314