https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463521 Continued suspension after affirmation of acquittal was unjustified where the departmental proceedings arose from the same facts and evidence as the criminal case; discretion under the service rules had to be exercised reasonably on relevant material, so the employee was entitled to full pay and allowances from 27 September 2005. Once the employee was exonerated in the departmental enquiry, he could not be denied consideration for notional promotion merely because earlier proceedings were pending; the denial of promotion was erroneous, and he was entitled to consequential service, pay fixation, and retiral benefits. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 11:36:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463521 Continued suspension after affirmation of acquittal was unjustified where the departmental proceedings arose from the same facts and evidence as the criminal case; discretion under the service rules had to be exercised reasonably on relevant material, so the employee was entitled to full pay and allowances from 27 September 2005. Once the employee was exonerated in the departmental enquiry, he could not be denied consideration for notional promotion merely because earlier proceedings were pending; the denial of promotion was erroneous, and he was entitled to consequential service, pay fixation, and retiral benefits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463521