<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 541 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463519</link>
    <description>A bona fide preliminary enquiry may proceed before any formal charge-sheet is issued, and a writ court should not ordinarily interfere at that stage where the enquiry is only a fact-finding exercise to decide whether a regular departmental enquiry is warranted. The note further states that expiry of a suspension period does not create an automatic right to restoration to the post when serious administrative, financial, or disciplinary allegations remain pending; protecting the employee by continuing salary and allowances may be the more appropriate interim relief. The described result is that interference with the preliminary enquiry and automatic reinstatement were rejected, while payment of full salary and allowances pending enquiry was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 11:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 541 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463519</link>
      <description>A bona fide preliminary enquiry may proceed before any formal charge-sheet is issued, and a writ court should not ordinarily interfere at that stage where the enquiry is only a fact-finding exercise to decide whether a regular departmental enquiry is warranted. The note further states that expiry of a suspension period does not create an automatic right to restoration to the post when serious administrative, financial, or disciplinary allegations remain pending; protecting the employee by continuing salary and allowances may be the more appropriate interim relief. The described result is that interference with the preliminary enquiry and automatic reinstatement were rejected, while payment of full salary and allowances pending enquiry was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>