https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463518 Service disputes falling within Article 323A and the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 were held to be within the exclusive jurisdiction of the statutory tribunal, with the High Court's writ jurisdiction excluded. The statutory phrase conferring jurisdiction was treated broadly enough to cover claims by casual employees against the Union of India where the dispute was founded on an asserted service relationship and sought continuation in employment and related benefits. A narrow reading was rejected, and the forum challenge based on the employees' status was held untenable. The claim was therefore within the Tribunal's jurisdiction, and the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 11:04:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463518 Service disputes falling within Article 323A and the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 were held to be within the exclusive jurisdiction of the statutory tribunal, with the High Court's writ jurisdiction excluded. The statutory phrase conferring jurisdiction was treated broadly enough to cover claims by casual employees against the Union of India where the dispute was founded on an asserted service relationship and sought continuation in employment and related benefits. A narrow reading was rejected, and the forum challenge based on the employees' status was held untenable. The claim was therefore within the Tribunal's jurisdiction, and the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463518