https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463517 The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was treated as a broad exclusion of High Court writ jurisdiction in service disputes covered by the Act. Reading Article 323-A of the Constitution with Sections 14 and 3(q), the Supreme Court held that the Tribunal's jurisdiction is wide and should not be narrowly construed, so a daily-wage employees' dispute falling within that scheme could not be entertained under Article 226. Because the merits had already been settled between the parties, only the forum question remained, and the matter was held to lie before the Administrative Tribunal rather than the High Court. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 11:01:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463517 The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was treated as a broad exclusion of High Court writ jurisdiction in service disputes covered by the Act. Reading Article 323-A of the Constitution with Sections 14 and 3(q), the Supreme Court held that the Tribunal's jurisdiction is wide and should not be narrowly construed, so a daily-wage employees' dispute falling within that scheme could not be entertained under Article 226. Because the merits had already been settled between the parties, only the forum question remained, and the matter was held to lie before the Administrative Tribunal rather than the High Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463517