https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777769 Clandestine removal of manufactured goods was held to fall outside the scope of a maintainable appeal under Section 35-L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, applying the controlling precedent on maintainability. The Supreme Court then exercised Article 142 to prevent the appellant from being left without an effective remedy, set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appeals as not maintainable, and restored the matter to the High Court for decision on merits. All contentions were left open for fresh adjudication. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777769 Clandestine removal of manufactured goods was held to fall outside the scope of a maintainable appeal under Section 35-L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, applying the controlling precedent on maintainability. The Supreme Court then exercised Article 142 to prevent the appellant from being left without an effective remedy, set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appeals as not maintainable, and restored the matter to the High Court for decision on merits. All contentions were left open for fresh adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777769