<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 259 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777770</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that reimbursed statutory and third-party expenses recovered strictly on actuals without markup were acted as &quot;pure agent&quot; receipts and are not includable in taxable value under Section 67 for periods before 14.05.2015; the service-tax demand of Rs.58,96,594 was set aside. Demands based on alleged discrepancies between ST-3 and debtors (Rs.60,61,591) and between ST-3 and bank credits across 14 accounts (Rs.39,90,998) were also set aside after accepting CA-certified reconciliations showing non-taxable items and explained credits. Because the tax demands were unsustainable, related interest and penalties were not imposed and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 259 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777770</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that reimbursed statutory and third-party expenses recovered strictly on actuals without markup were acted as &quot;pure agent&quot; receipts and are not includable in taxable value under Section 67 for periods before 14.05.2015; the service-tax demand of Rs.58,96,594 was set aside. Demands based on alleged discrepancies between ST-3 and debtors (Rs.60,61,591) and between ST-3 and bank credits across 14 accounts (Rs.39,90,998) were also set aside after accepting CA-certified reconciliations showing non-taxable items and explained credits. Because the tax demands were unsustainable, related interest and penalties were not imposed and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>