<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777776</link>
    <description>CESTAT Mumbai - AT reduced redemption fine and penalty, holding Section 125 proviso caps the fine at market price less duty (Rs. 8,291). The Pr. Commissioner&#039;s higher fines and dual penalties were held unsustainable; the firm&#039;s penalty under Section 125 was limited to Rs. 8,291 and a fine of Rs. 8,291 under Section 112(a) to be paid within two months. The partner was absolved of liability attributable to the firm. Appeal allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777776</link>
      <description>CESTAT Mumbai - AT reduced redemption fine and penalty, holding Section 125 proviso caps the fine at market price less duty (Rs. 8,291). The Pr. Commissioner&#039;s higher fines and dual penalties were held unsustainable; the firm&#039;s penalty under Section 125 was limited to Rs. 8,291 and a fine of Rs. 8,291 under Section 112(a) to be paid within two months. The partner was absolved of liability attributable to the firm. Appeal allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>