<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 277 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777788</link>
    <description>ITAT held that capital gains were not assessable in AY 2007-08 because the sale did not materialize due to the developer&#039;s fraud; the sale deed provided automatic cancellation if the cheque bounced and the cheque could not be encashed. The Tribunal consistently accepted the farmers&#039; position that consideration was received only after court intervention, therefore capital gain tax for AY 2007-08 was not leviable on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 277 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777788</link>
      <description>ITAT held that capital gains were not assessable in AY 2007-08 because the sale did not materialize due to the developer&#039;s fraud; the sale deed provided automatic cancellation if the cheque bounced and the cheque could not be encashed. The Tribunal consistently accepted the farmers&#039; position that consideration was received only after court intervention, therefore capital gain tax for AY 2007-08 was not leviable on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>