<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 150 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46299</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petitions seeking reference of a legal question under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no grounds for interference. It affirmed the legality and validity of the Tribunal&#039;s order, concluding that no question of law arose for its opinion. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings on electricity consumption and production discrepancies, rejecting the petitioners&#039; arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:51:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 150 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46299</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petitions seeking reference of a legal question under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no grounds for interference. It affirmed the legality and validity of the Tribunal&#039;s order, concluding that no question of law arose for its opinion. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings on electricity consumption and production discrepancies, rejecting the petitioners&#039; arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>