<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 304 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777815</link>
    <description>HC held that post-sale services did not transfer any right in the copyrighted article, applying the SC precedent in ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. The tribunal correctly concluded that income from the sale of software is not taxable as royalty under the Income Tax Act or the India-UK DTAA. Appeal dismissed, with no substantial question of law arising.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 304 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777815</link>
      <description>HC held that post-sale services did not transfer any right in the copyrighted article, applying the SC precedent in ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. The tribunal correctly concluded that income from the sale of software is not taxable as royalty under the Income Tax Act or the India-UK DTAA. Appeal dismissed, with no substantial question of law arising.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>