https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777817 HC held that orders under section 201(1) were time-barred in most years due to unreasonable delay by the department and applied a six-year limitation as the appropriate yardstick. The order for AY 2010-11 was set aside; the order for AY 2011-12 was sustained as within the six-year period; the impugned orders for the remaining four assessment years were quashed as passed beyond six years from the respective reckoning dates. The court rejected a uniform seven-year approach and declined the assessee's four-year contention. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777817 HC held that orders under section 201(1) were time-barred in most years due to unreasonable delay by the department and applied a six-year limitation as the appropriate yardstick. The order for AY 2010-11 was set aside; the order for AY 2011-12 was sustained as within the six-year period; the impugned orders for the remaining four assessment years were quashed as passed beyond six years from the respective reckoning dates. The court rejected a uniform seven-year approach and declined the assessee's four-year contention. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777817