<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 307 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777818</link>
    <description>The HC set aside and expunged the last paragraph of the impugned judgment dated 24.09.2024 that contained disparaging remarks about members of the Appellate Tribunal, finding such comments potentially harmful to their reputation. Relying on SC authorities emphasizing judicial sobriety, restraint and protection of reputation, the court held that unnecessary caustic observations are impermissible and therefore deleted the offending paragraph.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 307 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777818</link>
      <description>The HC set aside and expunged the last paragraph of the impugned judgment dated 24.09.2024 that contained disparaging remarks about members of the Appellate Tribunal, finding such comments potentially harmful to their reputation. Relying on SC authorities emphasizing judicial sobriety, restraint and protection of reputation, the court held that unnecessary caustic observations are impermissible and therefore deleted the offending paragraph.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>