https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777831 HC held that demands for sub-contracting services previously dropped by the original authority could not be confirmed on remand without fresh adjudication, since those dropped demands were not challenged before CESTAT. The matter of liability must be adjudicated by CESTAT as the appellate authority. The petitioner was permitted to pursue its appellate remedy before CESTAT, subject to conditions imposed by the Court. Petition disposed. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777831 HC held that demands for sub-contracting services previously dropped by the original authority could not be confirmed on remand without fresh adjudication, since those dropped demands were not challenged before CESTAT. The matter of liability must be adjudicated by CESTAT as the appellate authority. The petitioner was permitted to pursue its appellate remedy before CESTAT, subject to conditions imposed by the Court. Petition disposed. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777831