<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463515</link>
    <description>A sexual harassment complaint must rest on concrete allegations and a fair, substantive inquiry; a generic grievance about rude, biased, or favouritist conduct did not by itself justify constitution of a sexual harassment committee. The Local Complaints Committee&#039;s ex parte, cryptic findings were unsustainable because no proper material was recorded and no effective opportunity of defence was afforded, so those findings were not binding. Parallel resort to the Local Complaints Committee was not accepted where an internal mechanism already existed and the later sexual harassment allegations materially differed from the original complaint. The person proceeded against was not treated as the employer on these facts, and the tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 17:08:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463515</link>
      <description>A sexual harassment complaint must rest on concrete allegations and a fair, substantive inquiry; a generic grievance about rude, biased, or favouritist conduct did not by itself justify constitution of a sexual harassment committee. The Local Complaints Committee&#039;s ex parte, cryptic findings were unsustainable because no proper material was recorded and no effective opportunity of defence was afforded, so those findings were not binding. Parallel resort to the Local Complaints Committee was not accepted where an internal mechanism already existed and the later sexual harassment allegations materially differed from the original complaint. The person proceeded against was not treated as the employer on these facts, and the tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>