<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1435 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463508</link>
    <description>Section 263 revision cannot be sustained where the Assessing Officer made enquiries on the land transaction and the section 54B claim, obtained replies and supporting documents, and adopted a plausible view on the facts. The record showed notices on the sale deed, purchase deed, agricultural operations, crop details, agricultural expenses, and the basis of exemption, so the assessment was not one made without enquiry. The revisionary authority could not replace that view merely because a deeper enquiry was considered desirable. As the twin requirements of error and prejudice to the revenue were not established, the principal commissioner&#039;s revisionary order was set aside and the original assessment restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 19:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1435 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463508</link>
      <description>Section 263 revision cannot be sustained where the Assessing Officer made enquiries on the land transaction and the section 54B claim, obtained replies and supporting documents, and adopted a plausible view on the facts. The record showed notices on the sale deed, purchase deed, agricultural operations, crop details, agricultural expenses, and the basis of exemption, so the assessment was not one made without enquiry. The revisionary authority could not replace that view merely because a deeper enquiry was considered desirable. As the twin requirements of error and prejudice to the revenue were not established, the principal commissioner&#039;s revisionary order was set aside and the original assessment restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>