<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46286</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962, based on import license conditions and the classification of Sodium Saccharine as Electroplating Salts and brighteners. It held that Sodium Saccharine could not be considered as part of the specified category in the import license, leading to the rejection of the petitioners&#039; arguments. The judgment emphasized the application of res judicata and the interpretation of import license conditions in determining the admissibility of goods, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the petitions with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46286</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962, based on import license conditions and the classification of Sodium Saccharine as Electroplating Salts and brighteners. It held that Sodium Saccharine could not be considered as part of the specified category in the import license, leading to the rejection of the petitioners&#039; arguments. The judgment emphasized the application of res judicata and the interpretation of import license conditions in determining the admissibility of goods, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the petitions with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>