<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46279</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed four show cause notices demanding excise duty based on the reclassification of goods already cleared as per the approved list. The decision upheld that excise duty should align with the approved classification list until its validity is challenged, in line with Supreme Court precedent. The ruling specifically addressed the mentioned notices, emphasizing no short levy occurred, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:45:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46279</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed four show cause notices demanding excise duty based on the reclassification of goods already cleared as per the approved list. The decision upheld that excise duty should align with the approved classification list until its validity is challenged, in line with Supreme Court precedent. The ruling specifically addressed the mentioned notices, emphasizing no short levy occurred, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>