<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46273</link>
    <description>Foundry fluxes and chemicals used to make sand moulds for castings were treated as eligible Modvat inputs under Rule 57A, because materials used in relation to the manufacture of the final product were not confined to items directly incorporated in the castings. The Revenue&#039;s narrow reading that credit was unavailable for goods used in or in relation to intermediary products, and that the exclusion for machinery and similar items supported denial, was rejected by applying the reasoning in Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. M/s. Zenith Papers. The petition was dismissed in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46273</link>
      <description>Foundry fluxes and chemicals used to make sand moulds for castings were treated as eligible Modvat inputs under Rule 57A, because materials used in relation to the manufacture of the final product were not confined to items directly incorporated in the castings. The Revenue&#039;s narrow reading that credit was unavailable for goods used in or in relation to intermediary products, and that the exclusion for machinery and similar items supported denial, was rejected by applying the reasoning in Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. M/s. Zenith Papers. The petition was dismissed in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>