https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777704 CESTAT, Allahabad allowed the appeal in part, holding that service tax of Rs.1,18,30,406 relating to service fees for 2015-16 had been paid and should have been excluded, and that incorrect flat rates applied for 2015-16 and 2016-17 produced excess demand. Consequently demands totaling Rs.20,64,934 (Rs.17,15,409 + Rs.1,21,799 + Rs.2,27,726) were set aside. A remaining demand of Rs.3,77,001 was upheld as unexplained. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777704 CESTAT, Allahabad allowed the appeal in part, holding that service tax of Rs.1,18,30,406 relating to service fees for 2015-16 had been paid and should have been excluded, and that incorrect flat rates applied for 2015-16 and 2016-17 produced excess demand. Consequently demands totaling Rs.20,64,934 (Rs.17,15,409 + Rs.1,21,799 + Rs.2,27,726) were set aside. A remaining demand of Rs.3,77,001 was upheld as unexplained. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777704